Library


2002 ANNUAL SUMMIT
THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE. INFORMATION AND LINKS ON THIS PAGE MAY NOT BE ACCURATE OR ACTIVE. FOR MORE ABOUT THIS  PAGE, CONTACT US AT info@transcoalition.org

Thank you to all those who attended our 5th Annual Summit:

Last Chance for Smart Growth?

Shaping a New Vision for the Bay Area in 2002

Saturday, March 23, 2002 10:00 a.m. - 1:30 p.m.


          

To view 2002 Summit photo gallery, click here.

On Saturday, March 23 the Coalition hosted our 5th Annual Summit entitled Last Chance for Smart Growth? at Oakland’s Laney College Forum. Despite the rain, over 270 people attended this year’s event! Featuring speeches from Local Smart Growth Heroes, Breakout Sessions, and an Awards Ceremony, the Summit brought activists together from all over the Bay Area, including San Jose, Livermore and Sonoma!

Stuart Cohen, Coalition Director, kicked off the event with a presentation on the benefits, shortfalls, and key next steps of the Regional Smart Growth process. Local Heroes followed with presentations on their recent Smart Growth-oriented work, including:

Local Heroes

Transit: Tom Radulovich - BART Board President

A champion of Smart Growth for many years, Mr. Radulovich was elected a BART Board Director in 1996 and re-elected in 2000. Representing the 9th district, he advocates improving transit-oriented land use and pedestrian, bicyclist, and disabled access. He also advocates system-wide renovation; design excellence; closer coordination between BART and local transit agencies, for seamless regional public transit; and creating BART's Strategic Plan, including station-area planning. One of just 30 leaders invited to participate in the Urban Land Institute's Regional Leadership Forum on Smart Growth in March 2000, he is Chair of BART's SF County Transportation Authority Liaison and Vice-Chair of BART Public Affairs Access and Legislation Committee. In 1999 he was co-author of the Proposition H initiative, garnering nearly 70% of the vote, calling for improved public transit in the Bay Area.

Rural/Suburban: Rischa Slade, Councilwoman in Vacaville, chair of the Solano Transportation Authority

Councilwoman Slade has served on the Vacaville City Council since 1996 and is a former Chair of the Solano Transportation Authority. She has over 12 years' experience as a local advocate and administrator for Solano County's very low-income residents, most recently as Executive Director of the Vacaville Social Services Corporation.

She serves on the boards of the Solano Affordable Housing Foundation, the Vacaville Social Services Corporation, and the Vacaville Community Welfare Association. Councilwoman Slade holds a law degree from Hastings College and a bachelor's degree in political science from Stanford University.

Social Equity: James 'Tim' Thomas, Emergency Services Network of Alameda County

Mr. Thomas has emerged as one of the region's leading voices on behalf of maintaining a strong social equity focus in Smart Growth planning and implementation. Through his participation in the Working Group governing the Regional Smart Growth Strategy, and as a Board member of the Urban Habitat Program/Social Equity Caucus, Mr. Thomas has done more than any other person to ensure that low income and communities of color have a place at the table when Smart Growth is discussed.

Mr. Thomas has over 25 years experience in community organizing for social justice. He served as an organizer for the Rainbow Coalition during Jesse Jackson's 1988 Presidential campaign, is the former Board President of ESN, a coalition dedicated to ending hunger and homelessness, and served for six years as Director of the Men's Shelter Program of the Berkeley Emergency Food and Housing Project.

Bike/Pedestrian: Amanda Jones - Bike Coordinator, City of Palo Alto

Ms. Jones coordinates Palo Alto's bicycle and pedestrian programs, and is widely recognized as one of the Bay Area's most effective bicycle advocates. Ms. Jones helps Palo Alto employers to implement Transportation Demand Management programs for employees; manages the city's employee commute program; oversees a citywide traffic safety and education campaign; coordinates regular meetings of regional Employee Transportation Coordinators; and coordinates Walk to School, Bike to School, Bike to Work and school trip reduction programs throughout the City of Palo Alto.

Ms. Jones has been an effective leader of the bicycle advocacy movement in California since 1996. Prior to assuming her current position in 1999, Ms. Jones helped the City of Palo Alto and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District to open and operate the first Northern California commuter bicycle storage facility at the University Avenue Caltrain Depot. She serves as an active member of numerous boards, associations and committees including the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals, the Association of Commuter Transportation and the new Regional Bicycle Advocacy Coalition.

Ms. Jones received the 2000-20001 Clean Air Champion award from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Ms. Jones holds a master's degree in human resources and organizational development from the University of San Francisco and a bachelor's degree from the University of New Mexico.

Urban: Patricia Walkup, past President, Hayes Valley Neighborhood Assoc

- Not in Attendance -

Patricia Walkup is a community activist who has been working for the past ten years to revitalize San Francisco's Hayes Valley neighborhood. She founded the Hayes Valley Neighborhood Association, which has been responsible for transforming this once crime-ridden, inner-city neighborhood into one of the most livable communities in San Francisco. In 1998 she co-chaired the successful initiative campaign to replace the elevated Central Freeway (U.S. 101), that terminated in Hayes Valley, with a European-style surface boulevard.

She is currently working with the community and the San Francisco Planning Department to plan for the development of 750 to 1000 new units of high-density, mixed-income, pedestrian-oriented housing on land to be made available by demolition of the freeway.


Breakout sessions
Breakout sessions were held in nearby classrooms, where participants discussed the Smart Growth Zones concept, issues and ideas, and priorities for the future of Smart Growth in the Bay Area.

* Smart Growth on the Edge
            Rural and Suburban Issues
* Building a Smart City
              Urban Growth Issues
* The Walkable, Bikeable Neighborhood
            
* 'Just' Smart Growth
               Ensuring Social Equity
* Transit: The Next Generation:
            Blueprint for a Livable Region

Smart Growth Zones:

Ideas from the Coalition Annual Summit 2002:

In four of the breakout groups participants endorsed the concept of Smart Growth Zones (SGZones). The fifth breakout, Transit: the Next Generation, is excluded. After some discussion, participants decided on the following priorities for criteria by which the zones could be defined, and benefits that should accrue within those zones. These are broken down into "Criteria" , or what would be required to qualify as a SGZone, and "Benefits". This summary hits on some of the highlights, except those from the Bicycle/Pedestrian breakout.

In general, groups started with the understanding that SGZones must:

· be close to transit hubs or "pedestrian villages"

· have mixed-use zoning, including significant housing

· plan for convenient and safe access by bicycle

Key Social Equity Issues:

· Smart Growth Zones must be located in a city/county with policies to encourage mixed-income housing, such as inclusionary zoning.

· SGZones should support development of locally-owned businesses, either by setting aside a percentage of new development that must be locally owned OR by using planning dollars to help local business owners to set up shop. The latter could be through support services such as co-op purchasing or assistance in securing access to capital.

· Planning in SGZones must be inclusive and bottom-up, with planning conducted not only by city/county staff but in a real partnership with local residents through community-based organizations.

· SGZones must be in a city with "just-cause eviction" or other renter protections to prevent displacement.

· SGZones fund should support wealth creation by local low-income residents, either by allowing them to use "sweat equity" to become homeowners, or other methods.

· SGZones should include senior housing in close proximity to BART, high-frequency bus routes, and other rapid transit.

· Some SGZone funds should be set aside as planning funds for community organizations. For example, this could fund community organizers efforts to help residents learn about and participate in planning processes.

Key Urban Issues:

· Regional agencies should work with local governments, developers, and environmentalists to fund smart-growth zones with 15%-20% affordable housing and 75% ground-floor retail.

· A Smart Growth Zone should have advance community feedback.

· To speed development, protect from challenges, and assure balking politicians, it could be endorsed by organizations like BATLUC and Urban Ecology or an endorsement-panel of experts.

· Instead of parking lots, stores could give a discount if you don't park. Streets would be restructured for bikes and pedestrians.

· To encourage people to live in a Smart Growth Zone in an inner city, public schools should be on a par with those in the suburbs, and there should be mortgage and rent incentives.

· Funds could be restricted outside of a Smart Growth Zone.

· There should be transit nodes.

· Housing should be fairly dense. According to the Sierra Club, it would need to be at least 100 units per acre to be efficient.

Key Rural and Suburban Issues:

· A key approach is to be incremental, and to gain acceptance by providing good examples.

· Growth should be located near downtown and near jobs and transit. Density should be 12-25 dwelling units per acre (D.U.A.) - good design is critical to acceptance.

· Subdivisions need alternate visions. There needs to be income diversity and good design. There should be diversity of density. We must acknowledge the need for single-family housing -- that is for housing choice and for a mixed-use neighborhood. Our strategy here should be an ascending strategy; one step at a time. Swing "voters" have the most effect in small cities, which means that alternate visions are typically harder to promote in the smallest cities.

· There should be a ten-minute walk to green space. Thirty percent of housing should be affordable to those below the county medium income (low income), and 10% should be affordable to very-low-income families.

· Distant areas such as Tracy and Stockton have undergone huge changes from agrarian to city. Sustainable agriculture should be zoned on the fringe in these areas.

___________________________________________________

Awards Ceremony
The Summit also marked our first-ever Annual Awards Ceremony, honoring Bay Area groups or individuals who contribute to improving the Bay Area while supporting our mission.This year’s awardees were:

 

· Bay Vision Award for inspiring and effective work on regional issues

Presenter - Rachel Peterson (Executive Director, Urban Ecology)

Awardee - James 'Tim' Thomas (E.D., Emergency Services Network-Alameda County)

 

· Outstanding Elected Leader Award for courage and vision in office.

Presenter - Evelyn Stivers (East Bay Field Representative, Greenbelt Alliance)

Awardee - Supervisor Donna Gerber (Contra Costa County)

 

· Local Motion Award to a great local campaign effort or leader

Presenter - Jeff Hobson (Policy Director, Transportation and Land Use Coalition)

Awardee - East Bay Bus Pass activists:

1. Kids First! - Kim Myoshi and Youth Activists

2. Reverend Andre Shumake


Coalition Steering Committee:

BayRail Alliance

Greenbelt Alliance

Latino Issues Forum

Non-Profit Housing Ass’n of Northern CA

Sierra Club

Surface Transportation Policy Project

Urban Ecology

Urban Habitat Program

Last updated: 4/24/02

 

Update: 03/06/03 

  © 2002 Transportation and Land Use Coalition   510.740.3150     info@transcoalition.org