BART Budget facts – May 13, 2002
Due primarily to declines in sales tax revenue and ridership, BART has fallen on
some tough financial times.
Steps BART has taken so far:
Shaved $15.3 million from this year’s budget by:
 |
Cutting
77 positions.
|
 |
Slashing
capital projects account to $12 million, less than half of what it had planned to spend
|
 |
Reducing
overtime by about half
|
 |
Shortening
trains
|
BART still needs some
combination of spending cuts and revenue increases that add up to $28 million in order to balance next year’s budget.
Staff has outlined possible additional cuts totaling some $14 million that include:
 |
Reducing
car cleaning and station and grounds maintenance by 15 percent. Cost savings: $3.1 million. Job losses: 36.
|
 |
Reducing
coverage of station agent booths. Cost savings: $1.2 million. Job losses: 15.
|
 |
Eliminating
one morning and two evening rush-hour trips on the Pittsburg- Bay Point line that were added two years ago to handle increased
ridership. Cost savings: $550,000. Job losses: 2.
|
 |
Cutting
an additional 12 percent from the cleaning and station maintenance budget. Cost savings: $2.4 million. Job losses: 30.
|
 |
Ending
weekday direct service on the Richmond and Fremont lines earlier. Cost savings: $560,000. Job losses: 6.
|
 |
Starting
service a half hour later and shutting down a half hour earlier.
|
Is it finally possible to institute fair parking fees for the service?
"I'm perfectly willing now to charge for parking or increase fares -- or
both," said Director Willie Kennedy, who had opposed those choices. "I would
rather do that." (SF Chronicle – 5/10/02)
"Those of us who live in suburban areas are going to have to look at some
parking charges," said board President Joel Keller. "We're all going to have
to look at fare increases. We're going to have to make some compromises here."
(SF Chronicle – 5/10/02)
Director
James Fang
said BART should consider a $2 daily parking charge, which
he said would make up much of the deficit. “It would give us the least amount of
pain for the least amount of riders,” Fang said.
For more information, contact:
Stuart Cohen,
Transportation and Land Use Coalition.
|