High Speed Rail
Slated for the November 2008 ballot is a $9.95 billion bond to jumpstart the first phase of a high-speed train system in California. TALC is working with the California High-Speed Rail Authority to ensure that environmental and social justice organizations are connected to the process. Input from these groups is being used to help shape strong land use policies, and ensure that all communities benefit from the project. A high-speed train system has the potential to focus this growth in existing downtowns and meet the state's growing travel needs while reducing our greenhouse gas emissions.
TALC position on High Speed Rail

TALC does not currently have a formal position on the California High-Speed Rail project. A few years ago, the Coalition discussed the project and determined that it was not ready to take a position. Now, we are embarking on an important Coalition process to determine TALC's position on the High-Speed Rail bond measure. (Learn more about the Coalition process.) Over the next few months, our Coalition member groups will be participating in a process to help determine if TALC will be supporting the November bond measure. We anticipate that the TALC Board will approve a position in June or July of 2008.

Resources
Past Action

At TALC's May 2003 Regional Meeting, Rod Diridon, Chair of the California High Speed Rail Authority, gave a presentation about the latest on the High Speed Rail Authority proposal, including alignments, costs, ridership estimates, and pending legislation.  High Speed Rail would connect the Bay Area with the San Juaquin Valley and Southern California. 

TALC members voted to conditionally endorse the High Speed Rail Authority (HSRA) Plan, and specifically SB 1856 (Costa), subject to the following conditions:

·     Put all train stations in existing downtowns

·     Use existing train track rights of way wherever possible

·     Do not run train tracks through protected parks, wilderness, sensitive habitat, or natural areas, unless there is an acceptable mitigation plan

·     Use the most direct routes that do not conflict with the other principles

·     HSRA shall not draw on existing sources of transit capital or operating funds

Update: 5/1/07

 Copyright ©2002 Transportation and Land Use Coalition     510.740.3150       info@transcoalition.org