REGIONAL MEETING
MINUTES
Wednesday, June 19, 2002
5:30 to 7:30 p.m.
Sierra Club, 85 Second St., 3rd Floor San Francisco
1)
Introductions/Announcements/Revisions to Agenda
** NEXT MEETING: JULY 17, 5:30pm **
Bay
Vote Yes, a coalition set up for the Prop D vote, is back together to convince the SF Supervisors to get control over
SFO’s budget and new runway project, and to support Sup. Peskin’s legislation to cut airport waste.
Specifically,
they want the SF Sups to:
· Conduct a comprehensive airport audit;
· Rein in the “reckless” spending at SFO;
· Defer all funding for the airport’s $10 billion runway expansion project in the 2002-2003 fiscal year budget.
Twenty-two
other organizations have already signed on, including CalPIRG, CBE, Sierra Club, NRDC.
Action – Should the Coalition support this movement?
Vote - Majority
in favor
Coalition supports this movement.
2) Campaign
Updates
a)
$3 Toll to Pay for Transit
Senator Perata is putting
together an advisory committee. The Coalition (via Stuart Cohen) will be a member of the committee.
b)
Solano County Sales Tax and New Coalition Solano Sprawl Report
Local groups, Greenbelt Alliance, and the Coalition have
been working together to influence Solano County's plans for a transportation sales tax, supporting investments that
will expand transportation choices and build a safer and more livable county. The Solano Transportation Authority has
released three potential funding scenarios.
The Coalition and local partners are continuing to advocate
for increased funding for mass transit as well as for planning incentives for smart growth, programs that were poorly
funded in STA's proposed plans. The Coalition has not yet taken a position on the sales tax plan and will not do so
until STA has developed a final spending plan.
For more information - including a 20-page report
co-released by the Coalition, Greenbelt, STPP, and the Solano Orderly Growth Committee - see our website at
www.transcoalition.org or contact Jeff Hobson, Coalition Policy Director, at jeff@transcoalition.org or 510-740-3102.
c)
Coalition report on avoiding future VTA transit cuts
The report, entitled
Sustainable Transit, is posted on our web site – www.transcoalition.org -
and contains fiscal analysis and recommendations.
The Bond will be on the
November ballot
3) Transportation
for a Livable Region: Shape the Coalition’s Largest Undertaking Yet.
The conversation focused on
the the final products that will be most useful to Coalition members. There are three current project outcomes: 1.
Visioning Process 2. Toolbox of model programs
3. Recommendations
Possible final products
discussion led to the following suggestions from individuals:
1. Digestible vision
2. Regional focus/plan
3. County-specific links,
since many people only work on local issues
4. Many smaller groups may
not have the resources to work on a regional vision.
5. Internet and Powerpoint
ready versions
6. CD version and slides
7. Modeling that shows
comparisons between models (ex. Origin-to-destination models using different transportation methods)
8. Printed publication, well
produced, with more detailed items only on the web site
9. Most of the time-energy is
spent setting up, each format design takes less to develop
10. CD/Web site may be more
work than is valuable
11. Need good policy
recommendations
12. Variety of formats
necessary
13. Coffeetable cost may be
greater than the audience value
14. Figure who is the
audience, then tailor products to them
15. Regional focus, but
explain how this affects my local neighborhood/town/county
16. Standard Report format is
not compelling or readable by average person
Final products (in
descending order of popularity):
1. Interactive online toolbox
2. Coffee-table publication
3. Interactive CD-ROM toolbox
4. “Vision of a Region”
video
5a. Presentation Materials
(most likely Powerpoint)
5b. Factsheets
6a. Standard report with: 6b.
Appendix
Kristi
Kimball of STPP to tell you what’s hot, and legislation for endorsement.
a)
AB 1925 - Sher - limited CEQA exemptions for transit-oriented development now supported by Sierra Club, NRDC and other environmental groups. The
bill tightens current exemption language and removes infill barriers.
Action
– Should Coalition endorse this bill?
Vote
- Aye’s 9
No’s 0
Abstain 0
Coalition
endorses AB 1925.
b)
ACR 211 – California Bicycle Coalition – recommends all cities and towns incorporate bicycle and pedestrian
facilities into transportation infrastructure projects
c)
Join CFN in opposing appeal of Williamson Act – helps communities afford land conservation.
d)
SB 910 – Improved enforcement of housing element law.
Action
– Coalition to endorse by consent - b), c), d)?
Vote -
Unanimous in favor
Coalition
endorses ACR 211, SB 910, and opposes appeal of Williamson Act
Additional
legislation updates:
AB 2637 - Smog Check 2 for the Bay Area (already in place in San Joaquin Valley)
AB 2292 - Housing zoning cannot change after it is set.
SB 1243 – MTC/ABAG merger bill. Meetings on June 26, July 3, July 10 in Oakland at Metro Center auditorium.
Leg. vote takes place in August.
*
Coalition may ask Torlakson staff to present issue at next regional meeting
5) Coalition
Campaign Against BART Service Cuts – Charge for Parking!
Final BART
Board of Directors Vote is Thursday, June 27.
* Note:
Coalition will stage a press conference and rally at 8:30am at BART HQ (Lake Merritt Station) before the 9am BART Board
meeting/vote.
We need two
more votes from BART Directors to win the parking issue! Contact directors who are undecided, especially Carol Ward
Allen, and those who may oppose, such as the suburban directors. Tom Radulovich and Roy Nakadegawa are firmly in support
already, no contact is needed.
6) Proposal
for Coalition Endorsement of Transit-Oriented Development Projects –
Coalition Steering Committee adopted the following policy for short and long-term endorsements:
Short Term
– Coalition will communicate endorsements from our member groups (such as Greenbelt Alliance, Urban Ecology and Sierra
Club ) to all of our members via email/web. Our member groups may then decide to take action on a local level concerning
a particular development. Coalition will not make official endorsements at this time, because our criteria may be
different in some cases from Greenbelt Alliance or other groups.
Long Term
– Coalition will consider utilizing staff or volunteer resources to begin officially endorsing development projects at
some point in the future, if it is determined that there are resources to do it properly.
No action taken by
membership
7)
Unveiling of New Coalition Logo –
Letter will be sent to our mailing list, notifying our supporters of our new identity: Transportation and Land Use
Coalition (TALC)
|